find me 9 gaps in research in the field of organic photo voltaics

Consensus

Talked to chat.consensus.app

In the field of organic photovoltaics (OPV), research has made considerable strides, yet there are several gaps and challenges that remain to be addressed to further advance the technology. Based on recent literature, here are nine key gaps in research within organic photovoltaics:

1. Understanding Charge Photogeneration: Efficient charge photogeneration in the absence of an energetic driving force and its effects need further investigation (Lowrie et al., 2023).

2. Minimizing Non-Radiative Voltage Losses: A significant challenge is to reduce non-radiative voltage losses influenced by the energy gap law (Lowrie et al., 2023).

3. Triplet State Management: Triplet states, present even in efficient non-fullerene blends, require strategies to manage their loss mechanism and explore their potential in enhancing efficiency (Lowrie et al., 2023).

4. Simplifying Implementation: Investigating simpler architectures like single-material photovoltaics or sequentially deposited heterojunctions to replace the standard bulk heterojunction architecture (Lowrie et al., 2023).

5. Narrow-Band-Gap Material Development: There’s a need to further develop narrow-band-gap donors and acceptors to utilize infrared photons, enhance short-circuit current density, and minimize open-circuit voltage loss (Cheng & Yang, 2020).

6. Understanding Degradation Mechanisms: Investigating the evolution of the energetic landscape upon environmental degradation is crucial for developing strategies to enhance the stability and longevity of OPV devices (Lami et al., 2019).

7. Processability and Scale-Up: Addressing the solution processability issue widely concerned in OPVs, including the development of processable materials and techniques for large-area fabrication (Yang et al., 2023).

8. High-Throughput Screening and Big Data: Leveraging high-throughput experimental and computational methodologies to accelerate novel material discovery and evaluation, integrating machine learning for material design (Rodríguez‐Martínez et al., 2021).

9. Morphology Optimization: Systematic control of active layer morphologies, including the development of bicontinuous interpenetrating networks with optimal domain sizes and mixed regions, remains a challenge (Lee et al., 2018).

These gaps underscore the complex interplay of materials science, physics, and engineering in advancing organic photovoltaic technology towards higher efficiencies, stability, and practical applications.

Like our GPT? Try our full AI-powered search engine and academic features for free at consensus.app.

You

give me 19 research gaps in any of the sub-disciplines of supply chain management

Consensus

Talked to chat.consensus.app

In the rapidly evolving field of supply chain management (SCM), identifying and addressing research gaps is crucial for advancing both theory and practice. Based on a thorough analysis of recent literature, here are nineteen identified research gaps across various sub-disciplines of SCM:

1. Data-Driven SCM: The integration of data monetization in enhancing supply chain security, resilience, and sustainability needs deeper exploration (Bechtsis et al., 2021).

2. SCM Education: Alignment of graduate course content with the evolving skills demanded by the SCM profession remains a gap (Lutz et al., 2021).

3. Digital SCM: The opportunities and limitations of digital technologies in SCM, including the Internet of Things and cloud computing, warrant further investigation (Büyüközkan & Göçer, 2018).

4. AI in SCM: Mapping out AI techniques that can transform SCM practices is an ongoing research need (Toorajipour et al., 2021).

5. Inter-Organizational Interaction: The increasing gap between environmental and social dimensions in sustainable SCM needs to be addressed (Ülgen et al., 2019).

6. Environmental Focus in SCM: A systematic framework to fill literature gaps related to environmental sustainability in SCM is needed (Elhidaoui et al., 2020).

7. SCM Integration in Metal Industries: Addressing the universal and confusion aspects of supply chain integrations requires further research (Dametew et al., 2020).

8. Sustainable Innovation: Examining the impact of sustainable innovation in manufacturer–supplier networks is identified as a research gap (Bag, 2018).

9. Knowledge Management in SCs: Addressing the methodological approaches, objectives, and findings concerning knowledge management within SCs is necessary (Salazar et al., 2018).

10. Supply Chain Innovation: Conceptualizing the supply chain innovation construct and developing measurement scales is a critical gap (Wong & Ngai, 2019).

11. Construction SCM Risk: Analyzing the risk research gap of the construction supply chain to provide a basis for future empirical research is needed (Tang & Xu, 2023).

12. SCQM 4.0: Developing a clear evolutionary path underpinned by the constructs of Supply Chain Quality Management 4.0 requires further exploration (Bui et al., 2022).

13. Knowledge Gap between SCM Students and Employers: Identifying and bridging the gap in expectations and skills between supply chain students and employers is crucial (Bules et al., 2019).

14. SCM Ambidexterity: Investigating SCM ambidexterity in SMEs and its impact on performance is an identified gap (Ruangkanjanases et al., 2022).

15. Sustainable SCM and Digital Transformation: The impact of technologies like blockchain, big data analytics, and IoT on sustainable SCM needs further theoretical development (Stroumpoulis & Kopanaki, 2022).

16. Post-COVID-19 SCM Resilience: Bridging the research and practice gaps in supply chain resilience post-COVID-19 is essential for future preparedness (van Hoek Remko, 2020).

17. Green SCM: Innovative approaches for designing green supply chains that consider environmental impacts and cost-effectiveness are needed (Abdi et al., 2020).

18. **Distributed Inter